Tool ID
Use one permanent mold or asset number that follows the tool throughout its lifecycle.
Choose the manufacturing route based on geometry, material, quantity and validation requirements.
Precision metal and engineering plastic parts from prototype through repeat production.
Tooling development, molded parts and production support for repeat plastic manufacturing.
Functional prototypes, complex geometry and low-volume parts without conventional tooling.
Explore 3D PrintingStart with geometry, material, quantity and critical requirements before selecting the route.
Request Engineering ReviewReview manufacturability, tolerances, inspection strategy and production readiness.
Design, materials and manufacturing resources for better process decisions before production.
Real manufacturing, tooling and validation decisions applied under project conditions.
Manufacturing support aligned with functional, quality and validation requirements.
Manufacturing facilities, quality systems and engineering support behind SPI.
Send your CAD, drawing, material and quantity for an initial manufacturing review.
Request Engineering ReviewAn injection mold tool history log is the continuous lifecycle record of what actually happened to a specific mold. It connects cumulative shot count with PM events, failures, repairs, replaced components, approved engineering changes, verification results, return-to-production approval and transfer status without replacing the procedures that control those activities.
Core rule: keep one continuous record from Tool ID and cumulative shots through intervention, verification and release. For the broader mold validation and release sequence, use the injection mold validation and release guide .
Every lifecycle event must be tied to the correct physical mold and controlled revision. The header should identify the asset clearly enough that maintenance, quality, production and transfer teams cannot confuse records between similar tools, duplicate molds or later revisions.
Use one permanent mold or asset number that follows the tool throughout its lifecycle.
Record the current part number and controlled revision associated with the tool configuration.
Identify the customer, project or program to which the mold belongs.
Record the legal or project owner when the mold is customer-owned, supplier-owned or transferred.
Record the plant, supplier or storage location responsible for the physical tool at the time of the entry.
Do not create separate history cards for routine PM, repair or transfer events on the same physical tool. Keep one continuous Tool ID record and update ownership, location or revision fields when the controlled asset status changes.
The history log should show how many shots the mold had accumulated when an actual PM event occurred. It records the completed maintenance event and the next due point, while the maintenance schedule remains the document that defines the required interval and task scope.
Record the total verified shot count at the time the event is entered.
Identify the completed maintenance event or related maintenance record.
Record the completion date or shot count associated with the most recent PM event.
Carry forward the next approved due point without redefining the maintenance interval inside the history log.
When a mold requires unscheduled repair or corrective work, the history log should preserve where the event occurred, what was observed, what physical action was taken and which record verifies the result. The entry should be specific enough to reconstruct the intervention later without turning the history log into a troubleshooting procedure.
Identify the cavity, insert, slider, lifter, shut-off, cooling circuit or other affected tool location.
Record the observed failure or condition that triggered inspection or repair without expanding into a full diagnosis.
State the physical repair or rework actually completed on the tool.
Record the inspection, trial, measurement or report reference used to confirm the repair result.
Affected Location: Cavity #2 · left slider shut-off
Finding: Local shut-off wear with flash observed along the slider interface.
Repair Action: Shut-off surface restored and fitted; affected area polished after rework.
Verification Reference: TR-118 / dimensional check DR-044
Record the repair; do not turn the history log into a repair manual. Detailed failure diagnosis, repair method selection and acceptance criteria should remain in the applicable engineering or quality record.
When an insert, core pin, ejector, slider component or other wear item is replaced, the history log should preserve which component changed, where it was installed and why the replacement occurred. A generic note such as “insert replaced” is not enough for later lifecycle review.
Record the drawing number, internal ID or controlled component reference where available.
Identify the cavity, insert pocket, slider, lifter or other exact installation position.
Record the removed item or revision when traceability is required.
Record the replacement part, revision or identifying reference.
Link the replacement to the repair, PM or approved change event that caused the intervention.
Example: Tool M-24018 · Cavity #3 · ejector pin EP-12 removed after abnormal wear; replacement EP-12 Rev.B installed under repair event RH-067; subsequent verification recorded against inspection reference IR-118.
When an approved engineering change alters the released tool configuration, the history log should record which change was implemented, which tool area was affected and when the revised configuration became active. The history record preserves the lifecycle event; it does not replace formal change control.
Record the approved ECN, ECO or other controlled change number used by the project.
Record the released drawing, tool or specification revision associated with the implemented change.
Identify the cavity, insert, gate, slider, shut-off or other tool area changed under the approved reference.
Record when the approved configuration was physically implemented on the tool.
The Tool History Log records that the approved change occurred; it does not approve the change. Impact assessment, approval routing and release control belong in the injection mold engineering change control process.
A completed repair does not automatically mean the tool is ready to run. The history log should record how the result was verified, whether the check passed and who authorized the mold to return to production. This creates a permanent release record without duplicating the full acceptance or validation procedure.
Record the inspection, trial, measurement or functional check used after the intervention.
Record the measured or observed result and its supporting report or evidence reference.
Show whether the mold is on hold, released for trial, conditionally released or returned to production.
Record the responsible approver, role or controlled sign-off reference.
Record when the verified mold condition became the active released state.
Repair completed ≠ production released. Keep the mold on hold or under controlled trial status until the applicable verification is complete and the authorized release is recorded in the tool history.
When a mold is transferred, exported, relocated or handed to another plant, the history log should preserve a clear lifecycle snapshot of where the tool is, whether open items remain and which release record applies at the point of transfer. It should not duplicate the full handover document package.
Record the plant, supplier, warehouse or receiving facility holding the physical mold.
Record whether the tool is active, preparing for transfer, released, transferred or archived.
Reference any unresolved tooling, repair or verification items that remain open at transfer.
Record the latest approved verification or return-to-production record applicable to the transferred condition.
Link the lifecycle record to the controlled handover or transfer checklist used for final release.
The history log records the tool condition at transfer; it does not replace the handover package. Use the injection mold handover checklist for the complete release-document and transfer-package review.
Download the updated four-page injection mold tool history log for continuous lifecycle traceability from Tool ID and cumulative shots through PM events, repairs, component replacement, approved engineering changes, verification, release and transfer.
Engineering reference template. Adapt project-specific approval, document-control and retention fields to the applicable customer or internal quality system.
It is the continuous lifecycle record for a specific mold, linking Tool ID and cumulative shots with PM events, repairs, component replacement, approved changes, verification, release and transfer status.
No. A maintenance schedule defines what maintenance should happen and when. The tool history log records what actually happened to the mold, including completed PM events and the next approved due point.
Record lifecycle events that materially affect tool condition or traceability, such as PM, breakdowns, repairs, component replacement, approved engineering changes, verification, release and transfer.
Record the verification method, result, evidence or report reference, release status, authorized approver and release date. Repair completion alone should not be treated as production release.
The transfer snapshot should identify the current tool location, cumulative shots, open items, latest PM or repair references, current release status, latest controlled change reference and the applicable handover record.
If the mold also requires manufacturing, corrective work, verification, transfer preparation or customer handover support, continue to the corresponding export tooling service.
Send the current tool history, drawings and available maintenance or release records. We can review whether the lifecycle record clearly identifies shot history, interventions, verification and current handover status.