IATF 16949:2016
Certified by AENOR CONFIA, S.A.U. under IATF certificate number 0585745.
Choose the manufacturing route based on geometry, material, quantity and validation requirements.
Precision metal and engineering plastic parts from prototype through repeat production.
Tooling development, molded parts and production support for repeat plastic manufacturing.
Functional prototypes, complex geometry and low-volume parts without conventional tooling.
Explore 3D PrintingStart with geometry, material, quantity and critical requirements before selecting the route.
Request Engineering ReviewReview manufacturability, tolerances, inspection strategy and production readiness.
Design, materials and manufacturing resources for better process decisions before production.
Real manufacturing, tooling and validation decisions applied under project conditions.
Manufacturing support aligned with functional, quality and validation requirements.
Manufacturing facilities, quality systems and engineering support behind SPI.
Send your CAD, drawing, material and quantity for an initial manufacturing review.
Request Engineering ReviewAutomotive Quality System
Dongguan Chaorui Precision Technology Co., Ltd., the manufacturing entity behind SPI's certified machining operations, holds IATF 16949:2016 certification for the machining of metal parts. For automotive programs, SPI can support customer-defined approval, traceability, inspection, and process-control requirements according to the agreed project scope.
Certified by AENOR CONFIA, S.A.U. under IATF certificate number 0585745.
The certificate scope applies specifically to the stated metal-machining activity at the certified Dongguan production site.
PPAP, traceability, CTQ, capability, and submission requirements should be confirmed for each automotive program before production approval.
Certificate Verification
An IATF 16949 logo alone does not define whether a certificate applies to a specific supplier, site, manufacturing process, or automotive program. Procurement and SQE teams should review the legal entity, production location, certified activity, exclusions, validity, and customer-specific requirements before using certification as part of supplier or project approval.
Buyer verification rule: certification demonstrates an audited automotive quality-management system within the stated scope. It does not automatically approve a part, PPAP submission, capability target, inspection plan, or customer-specific requirement.
Injection molding, tooling, assembly, or other SPI capabilities must be evaluated separately and should not be presented as covered by this certificate unless the certified scope explicitly includes them.
Automotive Approval Evidence
Automotive approval evidence should be defined by the customer, drawing, program stage, special characteristics, and applicable customer-specific requirements. SPI can support agreed PPAP documentation, production traceability, control records, and change-related evidence without assuming that every project requires the same submission level or document package.
Submission level, customer forms, dimensional results, material evidence, control records, and supporting documents should be confirmed before sampling or production approval.
Where required, production identity can be linked to the relevant material lot, drawing revision, manufacturing batch, inspection record, or other agreed traceability reference.
Approved control requirements should define what is monitored and when a process, material, drawing, tooling, or manufacturing change requires review, additional validation, or renewed customer approval.
| Requirement | Typical Trigger | Evidence to Define | Important Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| PPAP / Production Approval | Customer or program approval requirement | Submission level, forms, records, samples and approval stage | Do not assume Level 3 or one package for every project |
| Traceability | Material, lot, revision or customer traceability requirement | Required production and inspection identifiers | Traceability alone does not prove part conformity |
| Process / Change Control | Approved production process or engineering change | Control record, impact review and required revalidation evidence | Customer approval requirements depend on the specific program |
Approval rule: IATF 16949 certification does not prescribe one universal PPAP submission package for every SPI automotive project. The customer and program requirements determine the evidence, approval route, and release criteria.
Need the detailed document package or help deciding which quality records should be requested?
Special Characteristics & Capability
Automotive programs may require defined controls for critical or special characteristics, but the measurement method, monitoring frequency, capability index, sample plan, and acceptance target should be established by the customer and project requirements. SPI can support agreed CTQ control and capability evidence without applying one universal threshold to every feature.
Critical features should be identified from the released drawing, specification, customer designation, or approved control plan before inspection and production monitoring are defined.
Measurement systems should be appropriate for the tolerance, feature, datum condition, and customer requirement so reported capability data is based on a controlled inspection method.
Statistical monitoring or capability studies may be required for selected characteristics using production-representative data and the acceptance criteria defined for the program.
| Requirement | Define Before Study | Evidence | Important Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTQ / Special Characteristic | Feature, tolerance, datum condition and customer designation | Defined inspection and control requirement | Not every drawing dimension is automatically a CTQ |
| SPC / Process Monitoring | Characteristic, frequency, subgroup or monitoring method | Production trend or control evidence | Monitoring scope should follow the approved control plan |
| Capability Study | Index, sample plan, process condition and acceptance target | Cpk, Ppk or other agreed statistical evidence | No universal capability threshold should be assumed |
Capability rule: statistical evidence should be applied only to the characteristics and production conditions defined by the customer or approved project plan. Certification alone does not set one Cpk or Ppk target for every part.
Need the detailed logic for capability indices, CTQ studies, and how Cpk should be interpreted?
Review Cpk quality controlCertified Scope & Project Routing
SPI’s current IATF 16949 certificate applies specifically to machining of metal parts at the certified Dongguan production site. Other automotive capabilities must remain separate from this certified scope for supplier qualification.
Automotive metal parts routed through the certified site may be managed within the stated IATF 16949 machining scope, subject to the drawing, inspection plan and customer approval route.
For programs requiring drawing-defined CTQs, inspection evidence and traceability, review our Automotive CNC Machining capabilities.
Project-specific PPAP and change-control requirements should be confirmed before release.
SPI also supports injection molding, tooling, prototyping and other automotive manufacturing routes. These capabilities must be evaluated separately and should not be described as IATF-certified unless the certificate scope explicitly includes them.
Certification boundary: do not infer that injection molding, tooling, assembly or another SPI process is IATF-certified solely because the project is automotive. The certificate applies only to the activity and site stated on the certificate.
Need the dedicated automotive molding route or broader quality system?
Project Evidence
Automotive supplier qualification should be supported by project-specific evidence rather than certification claims alone. Depending on the program, buyers may need dimensional results, material and traceability records, production-approval documents, process-validation evidence, or controlled records tied to the released drawing and agreed manufacturing route.
| Evidence Type | What Buyers Should Verify | Typical Project Use | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional / CTQ Evidence | Drawing revision, inspection scope, datum logic and acceptance criteria | First article, sampling, production approval or controlled inspection | Measured conformity does not by itself prove process capability |
| Material / Traceability Records | Material identity, lot or batch reference, revision and required linkage | Receiving, production traceability and customer documentation | Traceability alone does not prove part acceptance |
| Approval / Validation Evidence | Required PPAP scope, customer forms, validation stage and release criteria | Customer approval and repeat-production readiness | Submission requirements are program-specific |
Evidence boundary: automotive case studies can demonstrate how inspection, traceability, validation, and approval requirements were handled in specific projects. They do not expand the certified IATF 16949 activity beyond the scope stated on the current certificate.
Review project examples involving automotive molding, dimensional control, material evidence, traceability, and approval documentation.
Review automotive case studiesAutomotive Project Review
Automotive quality requirements should be defined before quotation, sampling, or production approval. Send the released drawing and project requirements so SPI can review the applicable manufacturing route, certificate scope, PPAP needs, traceability, CTQs, inspection evidence, and customer-specific submission requirements before commitments are made.
Submit Automotive Project for ReviewRequirements should be confirmed against the actual project, customer, manufacturing site, and certified activity rather than assumed from certification alone.