Who defines the acceptance criteria?
Use the released drawing, specification, customer requirement, approved visual or test standard, and any authorized deviation applicable to the part.
Choose the manufacturing route based on geometry, material, quantity and validation requirements.
Precision metal and engineering plastic parts from prototype through repeat production.
Tooling development, molded parts and production support for repeat plastic manufacturing.
Functional prototypes, complex geometry and low-volume parts without conventional tooling.
Explore 3D PrintingStart with geometry, material, quantity and critical requirements before selecting the route.
Request Engineering ReviewReview manufacturability, tolerances, inspection strategy and production readiness.
Design, materials and manufacturing resources for better process decisions before production.
Real manufacturing, tooling and validation decisions applied under project conditions.
Manufacturing support aligned with functional, quality and validation requirements.
Manufacturing facilities, quality systems and engineering support behind SPI.
Send your CAD, drawing, material and quantity for an initial manufacturing review.
Request Engineering ReviewThe acceptance baseline should come from the released drawing, specification, CTQ requirements, approved visual or limit sample, functional requirements, material records, and any authorized deviation applicable to the inspected sample or lot.
For the wider validation sequence, use the injection molding validation and release procedure .
Part acceptance only: this page determines whether molded samples or production parts meet the approved acceptance basis. Final mold-tool buy-off belongs in injection mold acceptance criteria . FAI reporting, PPAP documentation, SPC, sampling design, process-window validation, and defect root-cause analysis remain separate topics.
PASS, HOLD, REWORK, or REJECT should be decided against a controlled acceptance baseline—not against inspector preference or a generic quality checklist. Before inspection begins, the reviewer should know which released requirements apply to the specific part revision, sample or lot, cavity, material, and approval condition.
Use the released drawing, specification, tolerances, CTQ or special-characteristic requirements, and approved engineering changes that apply to the inspected part.
Use the approved cosmetic specification, master or limit sample, assembly interface, and required functional or performance criteria where applicable.
Confirm the approved resin or material requirement, lot or batch traceability, cavity identity where required, labeling, and any controlled packaging requirement.
Include any authorized deviation, concession, temporary approval, or customer-specific instruction, and identify who has authority to release or disposition the sample or lot.
Do not create acceptance limits during inspection. Tolerances, cosmetic limits, test thresholds, sampling requirements, and release conditions should come from an approved project source or authorized deviation before the result is dispositioned.
A dimensional result is acceptable only when it is compared with the released drawing, specification, or approved CTQ requirement for the same part revision. The record should identify what was measured, the applicable limit, the actual result, the approved inspection method, and the sample or lot represented by that result.
Use the released dimension, GD&T callout, CTQ designation, or approved specification. Do not replace a project-defined tolerance with an internal default.
Link the measured result to the correct revision, sample or lot, inspection method, and cavity identity when cavity-level evidence is required by the approved scope.
PASS requires conformity to the approved limit. Missing, conflicting, or incomplete evidence should remain HOLD until the acceptance basis is clarified or an authorized deviation is issued.
FAI boundary: an injection molding FAI evidence record documents measured results against an approved requirement; it does not create the acceptance limit.
No universal cavity rule: separate cavity evidence only when required by the drawing, customer, inspection plan, or approved acceptance scope.
Where contractually applicable, ISO 20457:2026 provides a plastics-specific framework for dimensional and geometrical tolerances and acceptance conditions. The released product definition and agreed customer requirements remain the governing acceptance basis.
Cosmetic acceptance should be based on an approved visual specification, drawing note, master sample, limit sample, or other project-defined reference. A reviewer should not invent universal limits for scratches, flow marks, weld lines, gloss variation, color difference, gate vestige, sink, or other visible conditions during inspection.
Identify the applicable surface area or appearance class and the approved reference that defines what is acceptable for that part. Customer-approved master or limit samples should remain revision and program controlled.
Apply the viewing distance, lighting, orientation, inspection time, or other observation condition only when it is defined by the approved visual requirement or inspection procedure.
Link the visual result to the correct part revision, sample or lot, cavity where required, and the reference used for comparison so the final disposition can be reconstructed.
Disposition rule: PASS means the observed appearance remains within the approved visual boundary. An unresolved or borderline condition should remain HOLD until the authorized reviewer determines whether rework, deviation, or rejection is appropriate.
No universal cosmetic limit: do not apply generic defect sizes, viewing distances, surface classes, or allowable counts unless the customer, drawing, specification, or approved project standard actually defines them.
A molded part can meet its dimensional limits and still fail the intended fit, assembly, sealing, retention, movement, or interface requirement. Functional acceptance should therefore be based on the released assembly requirement, approved test plan, mating-part condition, fixture, or other project-defined functional criterion.
Identify the approved requirement for fit, snap engagement, thread, sealing, movement, retention force, alignment, or other relevant interface before the part is tested.
Evaluate the part with the specified mating component, fixture, gauge, assembly condition, or defined test method. Do not substitute an unapproved shop-floor check for the required verification.
A functional failure should remain HOLD or follow the authorized disposition path even when the measured dimensions are individually within tolerance.
This section verifies the released functional requirement; it does not develop the test method. Validation planning, cycle testing, reliability development, and process qualification remain outside this acceptance checklist.
Material acceptance requires more than confirming that a molded part looks correct. The inspected sample or production lot should be traceable to the approved resin or material requirement, applicable grade or color, relevant lot or batch record, and the production identity required by the project before final release.
Confirm the specified resin or material grade, color, filler, additive, or other controlled material condition where applicable.
Link the inspected parts to the required supplier, batch, lot, certificate, or other approved material record.
Preserve sample or production-lot identity and cavity identification where the approved acceptance scope requires cavity-level traceability.
Verify required labeling, identification, quantity, and protective packaging only when they form part of the approved release criteria.
PASS requires identity as well as conformity. If the material or production lot cannot be traced to the approved requirement, the parts should not receive an unconditional release.
Scope rule: do not assume that every project requires a COA, every cavity to be separately reported, or the same labeling and packaging controls. Apply only the approved project requirements.
The final disposition should connect the approved acceptance requirement to the inspected sample or lot, the recorded evidence, any applicable deviation, and the person authorized to make the release decision. A status should describe the actual approval state, not simply whether a part appears acceptable.
All applicable acceptance requirements are met, required evidence is complete, traceability is intact, and no unresolved exception prevents release.
The acceptance decision remains open because evidence, requirement clarification, traceability, or authorized deviation approval is still pending. HOLD is not the same as REJECT.
A defined and authorized corrective action may restore conformity. The affected requirement must be reverified after rework before the part or lot can receive final acceptance.
The part or lot does not meet an applicable approved requirement and cannot be accepted as submitted. Final handling should follow the applicable disposition authority.
To see how cosmetic, accessible-edge and assembly-fit conditions can be converted into traceable inspection and release evidence, review our toy mold acceptance case studies.
A part that does not fully meet the normal acceptance basis should not silently become PASS. When an exception is allowed, the deviation, concession, or conditional approval should identify the affected requirement, the parts covered, the approval authority, and the period or condition for which the exception remains valid.
Record the drawing feature, cosmetic requirement, functional criterion, material condition, or other released requirement being deviated.
Tie the approval to the applicable part revision, sample, production lot, quantity, cavity, or other controlled scope where required.
State whether the exception applies to one sample, one lot, a defined quantity, or another authorized period or release condition.
Identify the customer, quality, engineering, or other authorized function that approved the exception and the required closure status.
HOLD is not approval. HOLD means the decision remains open. The affected parts should remain on hold until the required evidence, clarification, rework verification, or authorized deviation closes the acceptance decision.
Conditional approval is scope-limited. Acceptance under deviation does not permanently change the drawing, specification, visual limit, or future production requirement unless the controlling project documents are formally revised.
Use the checklist to connect the released requirement, inspection evidence, traceability, disposition, deviation status, and approval authority for a molded sample or production lot. Replace each field with the actual project requirements before using it for release.
PDF · v1.0 · Project-specific review template
Use the released drawing, specification, customer requirement, approved visual or test standard, and any authorized deviation applicable to the part.
No. HOLD means the decision is still open because evidence, clarification, rework verification, or authorized approval is pending.
No. Fit, sealing, movement, retention, assembly, or another released functional requirement may still require separate verification.
No. A deviation applies only to its approved scope and validity unless the controlling requirement is formally revised.
Send the released drawing, CTQs, material specification, visual or functional requirements, and traceability needs. SPI can help organize the acceptance basis before sample approval or production release.