Corrosion & Formability
A strong starting point when corrosion resistance, ductility and forming or fabrication behavior are more important than maximum tensile strength.
Choose the manufacturing route based on geometry, material, quantity and validation requirements.
Precision metal and engineering plastic parts from prototype through repeat production.
Tooling development, molded parts and production support for repeat plastic manufacturing.
Functional prototypes, complex geometry and low-volume parts without conventional tooling.
Explore 3D PrintingStart with geometry, material, quantity and critical requirements before selecting the route.
Request Engineering ReviewReview manufacturability, tolerances, inspection strategy and production readiness.
Design, materials and manufacturing resources for better process decisions before production.
Real manufacturing, tooling and validation decisions applied under project conditions.
Manufacturing support aligned with functional, quality and validation requirements.
Manufacturing facilities, quality systems and engineering support behind SPI.
Send your CAD, drawing, material and quantity for an initial manufacturing review.
Request Engineering ReviewTitanium Material Guide
Titanium Grade 2 is commercially pure titanium selected when corrosion resistance, ductility, formability and weldability matter more than maximum strength. Compared with Grade 5, it offers a different balance of mechanical performance and material behavior, so the grade should be chosen from part function and service environment rather than strength alone.
For CNC machining, Grade 2 should be treated as a material-specific process decision. Heat generation, tool engagement, thin-wall support, burr formation and dimensional stability can influence the machining route and final inspection strategy. Product form and material condition should be confirmed before production.
This guide focuses on Grade 2 selection for machined components, CNC process considerations and RFQ documentation. It does not treat Grade 2 as a universal medical-implant material or a general titanium purchasing guide. For broader material selection, see the CNC Material Selection Guide .
Material Selection
Titanium Grade 2 and Grade 5 serve different engineering priorities. Grade 2 is commercially pure titanium, valued for corrosion resistance, ductility and formability. Grade 5 (Ti-6Al-4V) provides substantially higher strength and is selected when structural performance carries more weight in the design decision.
The choice should therefore start with the part function and service environment. Corrosion exposure, required strength, section thickness, joining requirements and dimensional stability should be reviewed before the machining route is fixed.
A strong starting point when corrosion resistance, ductility and forming or fabrication behavior are more important than maximum tensile strength.
Better suited to applications where higher strength-to-weight performance is a primary requirement and the design can justify the additional machining and process-control demands.
Grade 2 can remain ductile during cutting, while Grade 5 brings higher cutting loads and thermal-management demands. Tool engagement, coolant, workholding and finishing should follow the specified grade.
Do not replace Grade 2 with Grade 5 simply because it offers higher strength. Confirm the functional requirement first, then review material condition, geometry, machining risk and inspection needs. For medical or regulated components, the required material specification must come from the applicable drawing or purchasing specification rather than a generic “titanium” designation.
Material Performance
Titanium Grade 2 is commercially pure titanium rather than an alloy such as Ti-6Al-4V. Its engineering value comes from a combination of strong corrosion resistance, useful mechanical strength and relatively high ductility. These properties make it suitable for components where aggressive environments or fabrication requirements matter more than maximum structural strength.
The material specification should still be tied to the applicable drawing or purchasing standard. Mechanical properties can vary with product form and material condition, so generic datasheet values should not replace the certified material requirements for a production part.
Grade 2 develops a stable passive oxide layer that provides strong resistance in many corrosive environments. This makes it attractive for chemical, marine and process-equipment components where long service life is important.
Grade 2 does not match Grade 5 for tensile strength, but its ductility can be advantageous where forming, controlled deformation or resistance to brittle behavior is more important than maximum load capacity.
Grade 2 is generally considered more weldable than many higher-strength titanium alloys. Clean preparation and appropriate shielding remain essential because contamination during titanium welding can affect the finished joint.
A corrosion-critical fitting, cover, instrument component or process part may benefit from Grade 2 even when a stronger titanium grade is available. The correct choice depends on the actual load, environment, geometry and manufacturing route.
Do not select Grade 2 only because it is described as “corrosion-resistant titanium.” Confirm the required strength, service environment, product form, material condition and joining method first. For CNC parts, these material characteristics should then be carried into the machining and inspection review rather than treated as separate purchasing information.
CNC Machining Risks
Titanium Grade 2 can be machined reliably, but its machining behavior requires attention to heat generation, cutting conditions and tool engagement. Titanium tends to retain heat near the cutting zone rather than transferring it rapidly through the workpiece, so excessive cutting pressure or ineffective chip evacuation can accelerate tool wear and affect surface condition.
Tool selection and cutting strategy should therefore be matched to the feature geometry, stock condition and required production volume. Stable tool engagement is particularly important for small pockets, narrow slots and thin sections where repeated passes can increase localized heat and deflection. Coolant delivery should support the cutting zone rather than simply increase coolant volume.
Burr formation should also be considered during process planning. Sharp edges, intersecting holes and thin walls may require controlled finishing and deburring operations. Removing burrs without damaging adjacent CTQ features is more important than applying a generic deburring process to every surface.
Workholding has a direct influence on dimensional stability. Small titanium components should be supported without creating excessive clamping distortion, while thin-wall or asymmetric parts may require staged material removal and additional support. The machining sequence should be established from the functional datums and critical features rather than from tool access alone.
For demanding Grade 2 titanium parts, review material condition, feature geometry, tool engagement, coolant strategy, workholding and CTQ inspection together before release. If the part contains thin walls, small holes or tightly controlled positional features, the process plan should explicitly address heat, deflection and measurement stability.
A clear RFQ allows the machining route, material requirements and inspection scope to be reviewed before production. For Titanium Grade 2 parts, the material grade should be defined together with geometry, CTQs and required documentation rather than treated as the only manufacturing input.
Provide the information that directly affects machining, inspection and material traceability:
Send the drawing, material specification, quantity and critical requirements. SPI can review the geometry, machining approach, tolerance risks and inspection requirements before quotation.
Review CNC Machining Services